What have Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Blondie, Shakira and Barry Manilow in common (other than being musicians of course)? They all recently sold the rights to their back catalogue or at least part of it for a tidy sum.
Neil Young, for example, has sold a stake of 50% of his 1180 tracks for an estimated $150 million. Bob Dylan, on the other hand, sold his full catalogue for a reported $300 million to Universal Music Publishing. Dolly Parton and David Crosby of Crosby Stills Nash and Young to name but them are apparently considering following in their steps.
While sales of records have been falling for years, streaming services such as Apple Music and Spotify have been booming. But for musicians generally it’s performing live in front of an as big as possible audience which pays the most. With concert venues around the globe closed for the best part of a year now and touring being a distant memory, however, artists lost their most reliable way to make money (not that the top grossing performers are in dire straits anyway).

Being cooped up at home, and even before the pandemic, streaming songs has become ever more popular, at the detriment of sales of albums and songs. In the US, in 2019, streaming music represented 85% of consumption when measured by album units. But streaming doesn’t pay nearly as well as a live performance: A songwriter is being paid a Mechanical Royalty of 9.1 cents (typically split with co-writers and publishers), on each sale of an album or a song, or a legal download. And then there is Performance Royalty, which is due when their song is performed on terrestrial broadcast radio, in a live performance venue, or via online streaming services.
Therefore, in order to make a half decent living, a musician needs to have quite a vast collection of songs and a big fan base who stream his songs. Bob Dylan, for example, is said to have earned royalties worth approximately $15 million a year from his catalogue. If we assume that he sold his future royalties for $300 million, he would have to live another 20 years to the proud age of 99 to earn the same amount.
With performing live not an option and streaming paying a pittance, selling the rights to the music is an increasingly appealing option for artists. Another reason certainly is avoiding family feuds as the one involving the legacy of Frank Zappa who passed away in 1993 (the dispute erupted after his widow’s death last October, when two of his children found out that their two siblings inherited a majority stake and were put in charge of the family business). Last but not least, let’s face it, capital gains taxes in many jurisdictions are lower than income tax, saving the artist a bundle.
And we all can now not only listen to our favourite artists’ music, but own own a small share of the rights to these songs too: The Hipgnosis Songs Fund (owns, for example, the rights to the music of Neil Young) and the Round Hill Music Royalty Fund (owner of the rights to some of the early Beatles tracks as well as the music of Neil Sedaka and Craig David) are both listed on the London Stock Exchange.
Interesting! I have a back catalogue of over 600 unpublished poems. I reckon if I sold the copyright I might have enough for a pie and pea supper for one!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who knows, maybe a dinner for two if you set them to some music… but in any case it’s good to know that you will keep us entertained with your excellent poetry for a good while yet 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
😂Thank you!
LikeLike
So good to see you back, on stage, live, and in person! A most interesting read too. Wasn’t aware of any of the economics or current events surrounding. No bone to pick with artists because they are artists, and I’m not communist or socialist (I don’t think) but it rightly chaps my sit-down to understand a musician can sell ghosts of his/her former brilliance for humongous sums, while, for example, the garbage truck driver and can-handlers, the best in their trade, can do no such thing? How about the computer programmer who wrote a phenomenal suite of programs, backbone of the NYSE (for example) or the high-tension power wire tender who for thirty years kept factories humming and people (even yet today) able to power those very devices necessary to “stream” musicians’ ephemeral doings? Something is amiss. I think. I believe. Thank you good, Sir GOM for making the old greys vibrate. Stay well, stay safe, and see you again. Soon?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Sir, for your thoughtful reply. I think the fact that artists are paid humongous sums for their former brilliance as you rightly call it has a lot to do with the entertainment value of their creations to the masses, similar, as someone explained to me one day, why the best footballers are being paid hundreds of millions. And I suppose the key word here is ‘entertainment’. Services such as functioning electricity grids or financial systems are being taken for granted (well, the former maybe a bit less in Texas nowadays), so there is no premium being paid for something which we only really notice when it’s doesn’t work anymore. Will try to be back again soon….
LikeLiked by 1 person